Paper Trading And The Transition To Real Money Trading

Paper trading is widely discussed regarding its merits,giving your direction and entry price, along with
and whether it is of value to a trader as they try tosubsequent posts of any partial profits, and of
make the transition to real money trader. Onecourse your exit, which ultimately is the determinant
viewpoint is that since paper trading is not real, theof whether the trade was profitable.  There is no
profits are meaningless, and are no indication of realneed to make any comments, or answer any
money profitability.  An opposite viewpoint wouldquestions regarding your trades – simply post the
state that paper trading is an important step in theparticulars as fast and real time as possible AND see
trader’s learning progression, and regardless ofif you feel any emotions doing this in front of the
whether it is real, if the trader cannotrest of the room while you go through a series of
‘properly’ paper trade, then they will not belosses.  Do you want to add even more emotions? 
able to real money trade.Go through the same posting process, but do so
I began trading in early 1995, with the intentions ofwhere the rest of the room actually knows the
becoming an options trader; my first tradingmethod that you are trading, and what the trades
education was through an oex options teaching‘should’ be.  You will quickly find out just
service.  Besides options training, the service includedhow emotional paper trading can be – actually a
‘tape’ reading, trade management ANDvery valuable exercise for the paper trader to do.
sp500 index futures trading – also included in thePaper Trading And Making It Further Beneficial
service was the prevalent attitude that paper tradingI have two predominant problems with paper trading,
was for ‘sissies’.but this is with the trader’s approach, and not
So I was a new trader, trying to learn andwith paper trading by definition:  (1) the trader does
understand completely new concepts and ideas -‘things’ paper trading that they would-could
what was called a trading method AND I wasnot do with real money (2) the trader views paper
‘practicing’ with real money – becausetrading profitability, instead of paper trading
paper trading was for ‘sissies’.  What did Iproficiency, as the guideline of whether they are
accomplish, besides a big draw down in myready to begin trading real money.
account?  I quickly introduced to trading psychologyI have seen too many paper traders, continuously
and the related implications – something else Iand knowingly, over trade ‘non-plan’ trades,
also knew nothing about.  Losing money and awith trading size that is greater than they could
trading psychology ‘wreck’, both from theafford the margin for in a real account – let alone
losses and thoughts like I was too ‘stupid’accept the risk of loss, while also holding trades for
to ever learn how to trade, became a combinationrisk amounts that they would not accept with real
which took me out of futures trading, and thenmoney.  Viewing paper trading as a ‘step’ in
unfortunately carried over into my options tradingthe learning progression and transition to real money
which I had previously been doing well with.  I justtrading, it is critical that the paper trader only trades
couldn’t take it any more – I had toexactly what, and how they would trade with real
somehow start all over, or just quit for good.money.  Don’t allow yourself to turn paper
Paper Trading Viewpointstrading into a game, supposedly because there is no
Consider:  simulator fill prices are not real andrisk – the risk of making bad habits that you
won’t be attainable with real money.  Even ifcan’t correct is tremendous, and will circumvent
this is correct, is it really an issue unless the traderany attempt to trade real money.  This is the time
intends to be a scalper, trading for very small profits,to learn YOUR basic trading setups, and make
and thus each tick is critical?  Granted, butnecessary adjustments to them and your entry-exit
shouldn’t a beginning trader be very selective,timing, in order to then make money trading them
focusing on learning their method and the– this is NOT the time to turn your simulator into
‘best’ setups that method provides?  Thisa pinball machine flipping at any ball that comes near
would be my viewpoint, and in this capacity paperyou.
trading fill prices are not an issue.There is a problem with focusing on trading
Consider:  the trades are being done with no risk. profitability -vs- trading proficiency.  To begin with,
No, there isn’t any financial risk in paper trading,profitability places the focus on money instead of on
but I actually haven’t met nearly as manyplan.  And what is profitability – if you take 10
profitable paper traders as one might expect.  Whytrades and make $75 are you profitable? 
would this be the case if being able to trade withoutTechnically, if you are net ahead you are profitable,
risk was such an easy thing to do?  As well, whatbut what if those same 10 trades had a potential of
about self-esteem risk, and an attitude like - how can$1,500, and you only made $75 – are you really
I be so bad that I can’t even paper trade? profitable?  This is what I am referring to when I
The risk feelings like these are probably greater thanthink of trading proficiency.  Instead of focusing on
that of financial risk, and if they are going to surface,the common metrics, such as win:loss or win size:loss
you would want to encounter them before tradingsize ratios, I am most concerned with the win
real money.  As well, even if the issue was only onesize:potential win size ratio, and want to maximize this
of financial risk – wouldn’t you want to beginpercentage to the extent that is possible.  For
with the confidence of knowing that you were paperinstance, when a trader asks about adding trading
trading profitable?  It would be hard to imagine asize, taking the attitude that if they can make $100
losing paper trading being able to profitably trade realtrading 3 contracts, then they can make $1,000 by
money.trading 30 contracts, the first thing I ask them is
Consider:  there is no emotion involved with paperwhat is their proficiency ratio – why increase
trading.  I was in our chat room watching a papercontract size and the corresponding trading risk, if
trader post their trades in order for me to give themyou ‘should’ be able to make more money
feedback, and I noticed that one of their specific planfrom smaller size?  This is especially important for
setups wasn’t done.  When I asked why, thethe paper trader, where they should not regard
trader told me that they were ahead for the daysimple profitability as an indication of readiness to
and didn’t want to risk those profits.  But thetrade real money, but consider proficiency – for
profits aren’t real – how can you not take ainstance, begin trading real money when you are
‘base’ method setup when paper trading60-70 percent proficient with your paper trades.
– isn’t that the point?  Would you be inSo What Is Your Viewpoint Regarding Paper
agreement, that if paper trading profits could beTrading?
viewed in this fashion, that it has the ability toI never thought that I would ever make a dime
become very real and thus emotional to the trader? trading, let alone be able to trade for a living or
I would suggest that this is related to paper tradingbecome involved with trying to teach others to trade
really not being ‘so easy’, and as mentioned– was this simply a function of starting over and
above, self-esteem risk can be very emotional.paper trading?  Granted that is too simplistic,
Besides examples like this, emotions can be added tohowever, I do know that it would have certainly
the paper trading process.  Throw away yourchanged the beginnings that I had, while very much
simulator, and then go into a chat room and post allshortening my learning curve, and reducing a lot of
of your trades – no ‘youknowwhating’pain.  
around where you wait to see if the trade wasClearly, I am on the ‘side’ that believes that
profitable before you post it, like a number ofpaper trading is not only beneficial, but that paper
traders that I have seen.  What’s the point, andtrading is also necessary – however the value
when you consider the underlying implications ofreceived will be dependant upon the trader’s
‘needing’ to do this – the issue certainlyapproach and attitude.  Needless to say, paper
isn’t about whether paper trading is of value ortrading as described is something that I have always
not, but certainly best to find out before trading realstrongly recommended.
money.  You must post immediately and without lag,